The paedophile ANTHONY (TONY) KIRWAN who abused my daughter is now not only out of prison but back living in Coventry.
Despite a promise from the Victim Liaison at the Probation Service to let us know if he moved back to the city, we found out only because my daughter saw him by accident at the bus station. And he smiled at her.
Naturally we are not allowed to know where he is living and working. He, on the other hand, knows exactly where we live and where she goes to school. He is not supposed to come to where we live or approach my daughter - but that doesn't stop him "happening" to be in a public place where he can intimidate her in that way.
It's a nice world where scum like Kirwan are protected when his victims and his potential victims are not.
2008-05-22
Gee - I'm so lucky!!
I'm so lucky - I just won £1.5 million pounds in a lottery I didn't enter!
Now if I were really stupid and really greedy I might just get sucked in.
Just as well I'm not ;)
=====
LONDON ROYAL LOTTERY®
I.P Award Dept.
TREATHMELYN,SANDFEILDS,
PORT TALBOT,WEST GLAMORGAN,
SOUTH WALES. SA12 7TJ.
WINNING NOTIFICATION
Dear Winner
We are happy to announce to you the draw number #1344/0771949, of the London
Royal Lottery online sweepstakes, where your e-mail address attached to ticket
number: 230613318 Serial number: 34559/07 drew the lucky #6 10 29 43 42 43
(Bonus ball). You have won £1.500,000 GBP (One million five hundred thousand)
Pounds Only.
To File for Claim, Please provide: the following:
NAME........
TEL.........
COUNTRY.....
Contact your fiduciary agent immediately via information below for processing
and claim of your winnings.
Agent: Mr Mark Ferguson
Email: markferguson0001@gmail.com
Dr Margaret Phillips,
Director Of Promotion
LONDON ROYAL LOTTERY®
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Now if I were really stupid and really greedy I might just get sucked in.
Just as well I'm not ;)
=====
LONDON ROYAL LOTTERY®
I.P Award Dept.
TREATHMELYN,SANDFEILDS,
PORT TALBOT,WEST GLAMORGAN,
SOUTH WALES. SA12 7TJ.
WINNING NOTIFICATION
Dear Winner
We are happy to announce to you the draw number #1344/0771949, of the London
Royal Lottery online sweepstakes, where your e-mail address attached to ticket
number: 230613318 Serial number: 34559/07 drew the lucky #6 10 29 43 42 43
(Bonus ball). You have won £1.500,000 GBP (One million five hundred thousand)
Pounds Only.
To File for Claim, Please provide: the following:
NAME........
TEL.........
COUNTRY.....
Contact your fiduciary agent immediately via information below for processing
and claim of your winnings.
Agent: Mr Mark Ferguson
Email: markferguson0001@gmail.com
Dr Margaret Phillips,
Director Of Promotion
LONDON ROYAL LOTTERY®
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
2007-10-16
2007-05-03
Senate Bill 1082 will gut DSHEA law
I'm posting this on behalf of a friend. She could lose her business and her livelihood, even possibly be arrested if this law goes through.
I don't live in the US myself but hopefully someone who does may read this and act upon it.
Here in the UK similar laws are being discussed. Those of us who currently use any of the multitude of food supplements and vitamins could find ourselves affected, to say nothing of the many small and larger businesses that will be affected by this.
Please read and take note. If you live in the US, please take action too!
Thank you.
Senate Bill 1082 will gut DSHEA law
As many of you know, Big Pharma has a lot of clout in this country. They are wealthy from overcharging many for their drugs which are sold for cheaper costs in other countries such as Canada and Mexico. Now they are legally trying to take away my store from me and potentially bankrupt me and my husband by gutting our DSHEA law which would allow for Big Pharma running the FDA to begin their reign of terror as they did in the seventies. It would allow Codex Alimentarius to be adopted in this country which could potentially allow them to confiscate all our shop inventory and destroy it, and jail myself, not to mention what they would do nationwide to the wholesale suppliers.
Senate Bill 1082 might not be personal on their part, but it has become personal on mine. Please read below and if you are an American, help support Senator Dorgan before Thursday. Send in emails and phone calls and let him know of your support. Also let Hatch and Durbin, who are Big Pharma puppets, know that you are onto them. See the letter below.
I know this is long but it is important. This is a complex and confusing issue. Bear with me and read on.
Senator Byron Dorgan:
Amendment to Allow Importation of Rx Drugs from Canada to US Could Help Kill S.1082!!
]
IAHF List: Please read Byron Richard's latest update from Capital Hill on S.1082 and utilize his latest form letter which pertains to the NEW situation we have now! A floor battle erupted today between Senators Durgan and Hatch over an amendment Durgan wants included in the bill which would help people on fixed incomes get more affordable Rx drugs from Canada and other countries. The supposed "safety concerns" expressed by Hatch during this floor battle were PHONY just as the entire bill is! The Rx drugs people are buying off the web from Canada are the EXACT SAME products people get in American pharmacies. Hatch is a true [Censored].
Durgan has the votes behind him to make his amendment stick- and Bush has vowed to VETO the bill if the Durgan amendment is included, so we MUST support the Durgan amendment- and Byron's new form letter (below) helps us DO this!! We MUST keep the pressure on! I'd also like to add a couple more news items: today I received an email from one of Senator Harkin's Iowa constituents in which one of Harkin's aides had responded to him by email stating that S.1082 "poses no threat to DSHEA". That is FALSE as Byron correctly states below.
I quoted the exact language of the bill back to Harkin's aide showing him where the terms FOODS and FOOD Additives are listed. Never trust ANY congressional aide, they ALL LIE, and they DON'T read the bills! Shaklee Vitamin company is ALSO misleading its distributors on this issue. I was forwarded a false statement from their legal counsel which I easily refuted, again, she hadn't even read the bill- the statement Shaklee's legal counsel is circulating on S.1082 is a direct regurgitation of the false statements being disseminated on the issue by Harkin's staff who haven't read the bill.
S1082 Update – Tuesday’s Activity
Fight Erupts on Senate floor:
Senators Bribed by Big Pharma vs. Senators not Bought Off
By Byron Richards, CCN
May 2, 2007
NewsWithViews.com
As the Senate continues to debate the Big Pharma-friendly sweeping reform of the FDA a new problem for Big Pharma’s prize Senators has erupted and quickly turned into confrontation on the floor of the Senate. At stake is at least 10 billion dollars per year in exorbitant Big Pharma profits. In one corner is Big Pharma-puppet Orrin Hatch (R-UT), representing the Kennedy/Enzi drug cartel. In the other corner is a majority of Senators lead by Byron Dorgan (D-ND).
At issue is an amendment that Dorgan has added to S1082, one that is vehemently opposed by the authors of the bill and by the White House. Dorgan’s amendment calls for Americans to be able to purchase prescription drugs from other countries. This would bring to an end the Big Pharma price-fixing scam that has Americans paying at least twice as much for the same drugs. Hatch unsuccessfully pleaded with Dorgan (while attacking him) to withdraw the amendment. Bush is threatening to veto the entire bill if the Dorgan amendment is part of the legislation.
The Safety Scam
The Kennedy/Enzi/Hatch/Clinton drug-cartel Senators are now in a real jam. Dorgan has the votes to make his amendment stick. Hatch and company have argued unconvincingly that the Dorgan amendment would expose Americans to adulterated drug imports. This is just another fake safety argument that holds no water and is being made solely to protect the excessive profits of Big Pharma (as is the entire bill).
It should now be crystal clear to the American public that those behind this legislation have been completely purchased by the Big Pharma lobby. It is a complete joke that they are trying to pawn off this legislation as “safety legislation.” This legislation is designed to protect Big Pharma profits for the next 50 years, and include new FDA regulatory powers that can be used to stamp out Big Pharma competition – including dietary supplements. Let your Senators know that you support the Dorgan amendment.
A Vote is Likely on Thursday
Word from the Hill is that all amendments and changes to this legislation will be finalized by Thursday and a vote will take place. In addition to the Dorgan amendment several other amendments are expected to come up – one very good and one very bad. The good amendment will be proposed by Senator Grassley (R-IA) and will seek to create an independent office within the FDA to monitor the safety of drugs already on the market (this would be another big blow to this legislation). The bad amendment will come from the vitamin-hating **** Durbin (D-IL) who will try to place food safety legislation into this drug safety bill. Not only is his amendment completely irrelevant to this legislation, he will, as always, figure some way to attack dietary supplements. I’ll keep you posted.
We must also get our amendment, THE PEOPLE’S AMMENDMENT, into this legislation (see action letter at following this article).
The People are Now Being Heard
We have word that the offices of Hatch, Harkin, Enzi, Kennedy, and many other Senators are being flooded by your concerns regarding what this bill can do to undermine health freedom and your access to dietary supplements. Their offices are seeking to tell those who get through that we are confused and that the legislation is not about dietary supplements.
Don’t buy this for a second. We are not confused. The language in the bill is crystal clear. It is a sneaky and devious wording buried in the bill. The Senate drug cartel hoped we wouldn’t notice. On pages 106-107 it states:
“The purpose of the Foundation is to advance the mission of the Food and Drug Administration to modernize medical, veterinary, food, food ingredient, and cosmetic product development, accelerate innovation, and enhance product safety….The Foundation shall [take] into consideration the Critical Path reports and priorities published by the Food and Drug Administration, identify unmet needs in the development, manufacture, and evaluation of the safety and effectiveness, including post approval, of devices, including diagnostics, biologics, and drugs, and the safety of food, food ingredients, and cosmetics.”
This language has been evaluated by Jonathan Emord, our nation’s leading attorney that defends health freedom, the man who has beaten the FDA in court more than any other lawyer. He states that this language gives the FDA, through this foundation, broad new regulatory power that it currently does not possess, including the authority to attack any dietary supplement (which are food ingredients). A simple amendment to correct this problem has been prepared by Emord and is in the action letter that follows. WE ARE BEING HEARD. KEEP SENDING IN YOUR MESSAGES. There are two days to go. We can win this!
http://www.newswithviews.com/Richards/byron24.htm
http://www.newswithviews.com/Richards/byron23.htm
(Place links to my two recent articles)
Anti S.1082 Food and Drug Revitalization Act
May 2, 2007
The Honorable (Senator First and Last Name)
Address
Address
Dear Senator Last Name;
The issue of drug safety and access to drugs at a fair price is of the utmost importance to myself and all Americans. In general, I am opposed to Senate bill S1082: Food and Drug Administration Revitalization Act, as it does not go far enough to protect myself and my family from the dangers of drugs. As one of the 150 million Americans that rely on dietary supplements to keep myself and my family well, I am especially concerned that this legislation broadens FDA regulatory power to harass functional foods and dietary supplements – which has nothing whatsoever to do with drug safety.
It is vital that the terms “food” and “food ingredients” be removed from this legislation. There must be no confusing the safety of drugs and the safety of food and food ingredients – which are governed by different laws. This bill authorizes, on pages 106-107, the creation of a new regulatory category that enables the FDA and the Reagan-Udall Foundation for the FDA to attack dietary supplements and functional foods. This problem in the wording can be corrected with this simple amendment – so as to be sure this legislation is about drugs and drug safety only.
Amendment to Bill S1082
Purpose of the amendment:
The bill, S1082: The Food and Drug Administration Revitalization Act, is hereby amended to eliminate any reference to the terms food or food ingredients, such that food and food ingredients will not be subject to any jurisdiction or control by the Regan-Udall Foundation for the Food and Drug Administration.
Intent of amendment:
To eliminate from the bill any possibility that food or food ingredients would be treated like drugs either for safety review purposes or for assessment of their efficacy. It is a fundamental tenet of food and drug law that foods and food ingredients are presumed to be safe and have to be established to be adulterated only if they present a significant or unreasonable risk of illness or injury
I am in favor of the Dorgan amendment that enables Americans to get a fair price on prescription medication.
I am in favor of any Grassley amendment that offers an independent office within the FDA to monitor the safety of drugs already on the market.
I am opposed to the amendment being prepared by Durbin, as food safety is a completely different issue and must be kept out of drug safety legislation so that there can be no confusion between drug safety and food safety laws – which are quite different.
Sincerely,
Your name
For Health Freedom, John C. Hammell, President International Advocates for Health Freedom 556 Boundary Bay Road Point Roberts, WA 98281-8702 USA http://www.iahf.com jham@iahf.com 800-333-2553 N.America 360-945-0352 World
I don't live in the US myself but hopefully someone who does may read this and act upon it.
Here in the UK similar laws are being discussed. Those of us who currently use any of the multitude of food supplements and vitamins could find ourselves affected, to say nothing of the many small and larger businesses that will be affected by this.
Please read and take note. If you live in the US, please take action too!
Thank you.
Senate Bill 1082 will gut DSHEA law
As many of you know, Big Pharma has a lot of clout in this country. They are wealthy from overcharging many for their drugs which are sold for cheaper costs in other countries such as Canada and Mexico. Now they are legally trying to take away my store from me and potentially bankrupt me and my husband by gutting our DSHEA law which would allow for Big Pharma running the FDA to begin their reign of terror as they did in the seventies. It would allow Codex Alimentarius to be adopted in this country which could potentially allow them to confiscate all our shop inventory and destroy it, and jail myself, not to mention what they would do nationwide to the wholesale suppliers.
Senate Bill 1082 might not be personal on their part, but it has become personal on mine. Please read below and if you are an American, help support Senator Dorgan before Thursday. Send in emails and phone calls and let him know of your support. Also let Hatch and Durbin, who are Big Pharma puppets, know that you are onto them. See the letter below.
I know this is long but it is important. This is a complex and confusing issue. Bear with me and read on.
Senator Byron Dorgan:
Amendment to Allow Importation of Rx Drugs from Canada to US Could Help Kill S.1082!!
]
IAHF List: Please read Byron Richard's latest update from Capital Hill on S.1082 and utilize his latest form letter which pertains to the NEW situation we have now! A floor battle erupted today between Senators Durgan and Hatch over an amendment Durgan wants included in the bill which would help people on fixed incomes get more affordable Rx drugs from Canada and other countries. The supposed "safety concerns" expressed by Hatch during this floor battle were PHONY just as the entire bill is! The Rx drugs people are buying off the web from Canada are the EXACT SAME products people get in American pharmacies. Hatch is a true [Censored].
Durgan has the votes behind him to make his amendment stick- and Bush has vowed to VETO the bill if the Durgan amendment is included, so we MUST support the Durgan amendment- and Byron's new form letter (below) helps us DO this!! We MUST keep the pressure on! I'd also like to add a couple more news items: today I received an email from one of Senator Harkin's Iowa constituents in which one of Harkin's aides had responded to him by email stating that S.1082 "poses no threat to DSHEA". That is FALSE as Byron correctly states below.
I quoted the exact language of the bill back to Harkin's aide showing him where the terms FOODS and FOOD Additives are listed. Never trust ANY congressional aide, they ALL LIE, and they DON'T read the bills! Shaklee Vitamin company is ALSO misleading its distributors on this issue. I was forwarded a false statement from their legal counsel which I easily refuted, again, she hadn't even read the bill- the statement Shaklee's legal counsel is circulating on S.1082 is a direct regurgitation of the false statements being disseminated on the issue by Harkin's staff who haven't read the bill.
S1082 Update – Tuesday’s Activity
Fight Erupts on Senate floor:
Senators Bribed by Big Pharma vs. Senators not Bought Off
By Byron Richards, CCN
May 2, 2007
NewsWithViews.com
As the Senate continues to debate the Big Pharma-friendly sweeping reform of the FDA a new problem for Big Pharma’s prize Senators has erupted and quickly turned into confrontation on the floor of the Senate. At stake is at least 10 billion dollars per year in exorbitant Big Pharma profits. In one corner is Big Pharma-puppet Orrin Hatch (R-UT), representing the Kennedy/Enzi drug cartel. In the other corner is a majority of Senators lead by Byron Dorgan (D-ND).
At issue is an amendment that Dorgan has added to S1082, one that is vehemently opposed by the authors of the bill and by the White House. Dorgan’s amendment calls for Americans to be able to purchase prescription drugs from other countries. This would bring to an end the Big Pharma price-fixing scam that has Americans paying at least twice as much for the same drugs. Hatch unsuccessfully pleaded with Dorgan (while attacking him) to withdraw the amendment. Bush is threatening to veto the entire bill if the Dorgan amendment is part of the legislation.
The Safety Scam
The Kennedy/Enzi/Hatch/Clinton drug-cartel Senators are now in a real jam. Dorgan has the votes to make his amendment stick. Hatch and company have argued unconvincingly that the Dorgan amendment would expose Americans to adulterated drug imports. This is just another fake safety argument that holds no water and is being made solely to protect the excessive profits of Big Pharma (as is the entire bill).
It should now be crystal clear to the American public that those behind this legislation have been completely purchased by the Big Pharma lobby. It is a complete joke that they are trying to pawn off this legislation as “safety legislation.” This legislation is designed to protect Big Pharma profits for the next 50 years, and include new FDA regulatory powers that can be used to stamp out Big Pharma competition – including dietary supplements. Let your Senators know that you support the Dorgan amendment.
A Vote is Likely on Thursday
Word from the Hill is that all amendments and changes to this legislation will be finalized by Thursday and a vote will take place. In addition to the Dorgan amendment several other amendments are expected to come up – one very good and one very bad. The good amendment will be proposed by Senator Grassley (R-IA) and will seek to create an independent office within the FDA to monitor the safety of drugs already on the market (this would be another big blow to this legislation). The bad amendment will come from the vitamin-hating **** Durbin (D-IL) who will try to place food safety legislation into this drug safety bill. Not only is his amendment completely irrelevant to this legislation, he will, as always, figure some way to attack dietary supplements. I’ll keep you posted.
We must also get our amendment, THE PEOPLE’S AMMENDMENT, into this legislation (see action letter at following this article).
The People are Now Being Heard
We have word that the offices of Hatch, Harkin, Enzi, Kennedy, and many other Senators are being flooded by your concerns regarding what this bill can do to undermine health freedom and your access to dietary supplements. Their offices are seeking to tell those who get through that we are confused and that the legislation is not about dietary supplements.
Don’t buy this for a second. We are not confused. The language in the bill is crystal clear. It is a sneaky and devious wording buried in the bill. The Senate drug cartel hoped we wouldn’t notice. On pages 106-107 it states:
“The purpose of the Foundation is to advance the mission of the Food and Drug Administration to modernize medical, veterinary, food, food ingredient, and cosmetic product development, accelerate innovation, and enhance product safety….The Foundation shall [take] into consideration the Critical Path reports and priorities published by the Food and Drug Administration, identify unmet needs in the development, manufacture, and evaluation of the safety and effectiveness, including post approval, of devices, including diagnostics, biologics, and drugs, and the safety of food, food ingredients, and cosmetics.”
This language has been evaluated by Jonathan Emord, our nation’s leading attorney that defends health freedom, the man who has beaten the FDA in court more than any other lawyer. He states that this language gives the FDA, through this foundation, broad new regulatory power that it currently does not possess, including the authority to attack any dietary supplement (which are food ingredients). A simple amendment to correct this problem has been prepared by Emord and is in the action letter that follows. WE ARE BEING HEARD. KEEP SENDING IN YOUR MESSAGES. There are two days to go. We can win this!
http://www.newswithviews.com/Richards/byron24.htm
http://www.newswithviews.com/Richards/byron23.htm
(Place links to my two recent articles)
Anti S.1082 Food and Drug Revitalization Act
May 2, 2007
The Honorable (Senator First and Last Name)
Address
Address
Dear Senator Last Name;
The issue of drug safety and access to drugs at a fair price is of the utmost importance to myself and all Americans. In general, I am opposed to Senate bill S1082: Food and Drug Administration Revitalization Act, as it does not go far enough to protect myself and my family from the dangers of drugs. As one of the 150 million Americans that rely on dietary supplements to keep myself and my family well, I am especially concerned that this legislation broadens FDA regulatory power to harass functional foods and dietary supplements – which has nothing whatsoever to do with drug safety.
It is vital that the terms “food” and “food ingredients” be removed from this legislation. There must be no confusing the safety of drugs and the safety of food and food ingredients – which are governed by different laws. This bill authorizes, on pages 106-107, the creation of a new regulatory category that enables the FDA and the Reagan-Udall Foundation for the FDA to attack dietary supplements and functional foods. This problem in the wording can be corrected with this simple amendment – so as to be sure this legislation is about drugs and drug safety only.
Amendment to Bill S1082
Purpose of the amendment:
The bill, S1082: The Food and Drug Administration Revitalization Act, is hereby amended to eliminate any reference to the terms food or food ingredients, such that food and food ingredients will not be subject to any jurisdiction or control by the Regan-Udall Foundation for the Food and Drug Administration.
Intent of amendment:
To eliminate from the bill any possibility that food or food ingredients would be treated like drugs either for safety review purposes or for assessment of their efficacy. It is a fundamental tenet of food and drug law that foods and food ingredients are presumed to be safe and have to be established to be adulterated only if they present a significant or unreasonable risk of illness or injury
I am in favor of the Dorgan amendment that enables Americans to get a fair price on prescription medication.
I am in favor of any Grassley amendment that offers an independent office within the FDA to monitor the safety of drugs already on the market.
I am opposed to the amendment being prepared by Durbin, as food safety is a completely different issue and must be kept out of drug safety legislation so that there can be no confusion between drug safety and food safety laws – which are quite different.
Sincerely,
Your name
For Health Freedom, John C. Hammell, President International Advocates for Health Freedom 556 Boundary Bay Road Point Roberts, WA 98281-8702 USA http://www.iahf.com jham@iahf.com 800-333-2553 N.America 360-945-0352 World
2007-04-25
Hmmmm
Well, I guess I didn't get very far with this, did I? Suffice to say last year was pretty crap one way and another.
I read another Blog today, by Lonewolf51, in which he said that the law is an ass. Or possibly that it was an a*se, which I think is what he meant. (Go read it, there's certainly food for thought there!)
He's not completely wrong; in fact in the case he talks about, he's completely right. But sometimes the law gets it right, and sometimes the law gets it right but can't do much about it.
The guy that abused the trust we placed in him as a family friend, Anthony Kirwan (also known as Tony) - the guy who snuck into my 12 year old daughter's room when we were all asleep and took photos of her naked and asleep and then made some of them into wallpaper for his computer and possibly shared them with the other perverts and paedophiles on the internet that he regularly talked to in chatrooms and via IM - well, he got sent to prison OK. He got sent to prison for having numerous disgusting images and videos of child pornography on his computer, the absolute least of which apparently was the photos he took of our daughter. The videos they described in court - dear god, if one of those had been of my daughter I don't think he would have lived to appear in court. The judge said they were among some of the worst he had ever had to sit through. Anyway, he got sentenced to two and a half years for ALL of his offences. Needless to say the defence played up what a sad childhood he'd had yadda yadda yadda and the prosecution - HAH! the prosecution nearly dropped the ball altogether. Makes you wonder what we pay the taxes for, if they can nearly screw up an open and shut case when the bloody defendent has actually pleaded guilty for lord's sake!
ANYHOW he got sent to prison, as I said, for two and a half years.
BUT
He is to serve only 15 months of that time.
He's part of the way through his sentence now. By my calculations he'll be out in November this year.
Where's the justice? I have to live with the images of those pictures in my mind the rest of my life (I had to go to the police station and identify every last one of them). My duaghter has to live with knowing that asshole was in her ROOM taking PICTURES. We ALL have to live with the fact that he stayed in our home, at our invitation. And EVEN THOUGH we didn't know, had no idea, not a clue, what he was like we still have to live with the guilt that even having him cross the threshold never mind letting him sleep here EVER, brings to all of us.
Yet he will be out and about amongst other people, other kids, in November.
The only good thing about it is that in this case, policing WORKED.
You know how he got caught?
He complained about his neighbours throwing stones at his house.
It turned out they threw stones at his house because he lured neighbourhood kids to his house, where he had toys and kids videos. Small kids stuff, older kids stuff. Bear in mind this was an unmarried, unattached guy in his 30s with no kids of his own (though scarily enough the police, when they did get a warrant and searched the house, found an application in process to ADOPT a child) who had Barbie dolls and stuff all there. AND a video camera set up in the bedroom and small kids underpants he had stolen from a washing line there too.
So anyway, the police came round to see what was going on, saw all this stuff and were highly suspicious. They seized his computer and sent it off for forensic examination, where they found all the above-mentioned pictures and videos stored. Apparently he'd tried to delete them but hadn't succeeded in getting rid of them completely. (Garry Glitter, anyone?)
So when charged, he denied all knowledge of how they'd got onto his computer. (I guess the bad computer fairy must have put them there.)
Which just goes to show that someone, somewhere, has a sense of humour I guess. Because the slimeball got caught, bang to rights, and eventually was persuaded by his lawyers to plead guilty because he didn't have a snowball's chance in hell of getting off with all the evidence there was against him. Including my statement.
BUT my point is, with all that, he still only got a two and a half year sentence. Of which he only has to serve 15 months. After that, he's out. He still has to keep away from all kids under the age of 18 years but honestly - how are they going to police that?
Anyway, that's why last year was a crappy year for us.
Now I've got that off my chest, I hope that my next post will be more positive.
I read another Blog today, by Lonewolf51, in which he said that the law is an ass. Or possibly that it was an a*se, which I think is what he meant. (Go read it, there's certainly food for thought there!)
He's not completely wrong; in fact in the case he talks about, he's completely right. But sometimes the law gets it right, and sometimes the law gets it right but can't do much about it.
The guy that abused the trust we placed in him as a family friend, Anthony Kirwan (also known as Tony) - the guy who snuck into my 12 year old daughter's room when we were all asleep and took photos of her naked and asleep and then made some of them into wallpaper for his computer and possibly shared them with the other perverts and paedophiles on the internet that he regularly talked to in chatrooms and via IM - well, he got sent to prison OK. He got sent to prison for having numerous disgusting images and videos of child pornography on his computer, the absolute least of which apparently was the photos he took of our daughter. The videos they described in court - dear god, if one of those had been of my daughter I don't think he would have lived to appear in court. The judge said they were among some of the worst he had ever had to sit through. Anyway, he got sentenced to two and a half years for ALL of his offences. Needless to say the defence played up what a sad childhood he'd had yadda yadda yadda and the prosecution - HAH! the prosecution nearly dropped the ball altogether. Makes you wonder what we pay the taxes for, if they can nearly screw up an open and shut case when the bloody defendent has actually pleaded guilty for lord's sake!
ANYHOW he got sent to prison, as I said, for two and a half years.
BUT
He is to serve only 15 months of that time.
He's part of the way through his sentence now. By my calculations he'll be out in November this year.
Where's the justice? I have to live with the images of those pictures in my mind the rest of my life (I had to go to the police station and identify every last one of them). My duaghter has to live with knowing that asshole was in her ROOM taking PICTURES. We ALL have to live with the fact that he stayed in our home, at our invitation. And EVEN THOUGH we didn't know, had no idea, not a clue, what he was like we still have to live with the guilt that even having him cross the threshold never mind letting him sleep here EVER, brings to all of us.
Yet he will be out and about amongst other people, other kids, in November.
The only good thing about it is that in this case, policing WORKED.
You know how he got caught?
He complained about his neighbours throwing stones at his house.
It turned out they threw stones at his house because he lured neighbourhood kids to his house, where he had toys and kids videos. Small kids stuff, older kids stuff. Bear in mind this was an unmarried, unattached guy in his 30s with no kids of his own (though scarily enough the police, when they did get a warrant and searched the house, found an application in process to ADOPT a child) who had Barbie dolls and stuff all there. AND a video camera set up in the bedroom and small kids underpants he had stolen from a washing line there too.
So anyway, the police came round to see what was going on, saw all this stuff and were highly suspicious. They seized his computer and sent it off for forensic examination, where they found all the above-mentioned pictures and videos stored. Apparently he'd tried to delete them but hadn't succeeded in getting rid of them completely. (Garry Glitter, anyone?)
So when charged, he denied all knowledge of how they'd got onto his computer. (I guess the bad computer fairy must have put them there.)
Which just goes to show that someone, somewhere, has a sense of humour I guess. Because the slimeball got caught, bang to rights, and eventually was persuaded by his lawyers to plead guilty because he didn't have a snowball's chance in hell of getting off with all the evidence there was against him. Including my statement.
BUT my point is, with all that, he still only got a two and a half year sentence. Of which he only has to serve 15 months. After that, he's out. He still has to keep away from all kids under the age of 18 years but honestly - how are they going to police that?
Anyway, that's why last year was a crappy year for us.
Now I've got that off my chest, I hope that my next post will be more positive.
2006-07-25
Here goes!
Well, here goes. I've known a few people have blogs but never tried one myself before. So bear with me until I get the hang of it.
I'll be writing about things that are happening to me and my family, some good, some bad.
If you don't like what you read here, I'm sorry, but this is my take on what's going on with my family and as such I make no apology for any difficult or contraversial subjects that might be covered.
I'll be writing about things that are happening to me and my family, some good, some bad.
If you don't like what you read here, I'm sorry, but this is my take on what's going on with my family and as such I make no apology for any difficult or contraversial subjects that might be covered.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)